| Commentary for
the Mercury: Newsletter |
Laws Grant Rights!?
October 2000
Do
you ever get angry when you listen or watch the news? I often get angry,
not just because many of the networks are extremely biased, but because the
stories they report are scary in and of themselves. One of these instances
that made me stop and scream at the television occurred recently.
While working at my
computer, I was listening to one of the major network's in the background. The
news story had to do with a lawsuit being brought against Mp3.com and other
such Internet companies. Somewhere in the story it was mentioned that
a particular law "permitting" recording of non-commercial music did
not apply to this situation because a computer is not used primarily for recording.
When did we start passing
laws in order to PERMIT us to do things? Have we really strayed so far
from the true purpose of the law in the United States that we now believe that
a law must be passed in order to grant citizens their rights?
No matter what your
thoughts are on the recording and distribution of music over the Internet, when
we start issuing laws that "permit" us to do things, then I fear we
have gone done a road from which it may be nearly impossible to return.
What is the true purpose
of a law? The purpose of a law should be to punish actions that would
be an offense to one's life, liberty, and property. Anything beyond this basic
purpose is a dangerous perversion of the law.
Unfortunately, most
laws passed in recent history are doing just the opposite as they are suppose
to be doing. Legislators are passing more and more laws that benefit only
certain people. This type of selective plunder is a sure sign of
communistic socialism. Whenever the government "gives" something
to one person, it is actually taking away from another.
Both the Republicans
and Democrats along with most other political parties are guilty of what one
might call "Legal Plunder." The best description of legal plunder
and the true purpose of the law can be found in a pamphlet written by Frederick
Bastiat. Frederick Batstiat's work is simply entitled, "The Law."
Legal plunder, communism,
and socialism are the same thing in their most basic forms. Items are
transferred at one's expense to another. Whether this is done lawfully
or even willingly are of no concern. It is simply the philosophy that
is dangerous.
As one person is plundered
others will follow human nature which tells them that they should plunder also
in order to receive fair treatment. Thus we see how a proliferation of
"legal plunder" laws can fill society.
History tells us that
once this philosophy becomes entrenched the only way to end it is usually by
a total rebellion which usually leads to bloodshed. Perhaps we can save
our country before it meets this endless road, but it becomes less likely each
day we let it go. Do you ever get angry when you listen
or watch the news? I often get angry, not just because many of the networks
are extremely biased, but because the stories they report are scary in and of
themselves. One of these instances that made me stop and scream at the
television occurred recently.
While working at my
computer, I was listening to one of the major network's in the background. The
news story had to do with a lawsuit being brought against Mp3.com and other
such Internet companies. Somewhere in the story it was mentioned that
a particular law "permitting" recording of non-commercial music did
not apply to this situation because a computer is not used primarily for recording.
When did we start passing
laws in order to PERMIT us to do things? Have we really strayed so far
from the true purpose of the law in the United States that we now believe that
a law must be passed in order to grant citizens their rights?
No matter what your
thoughts are on the recording and distribution of music over the Internet, when
we start issuing laws that "permit" us to do things, then I fear we
have gone done a road from which it may be nearly impossible to return.
What is the true purpose
of a law? The purpose of a law should be to punish actions that would
be an offense to one's life, liberty, and property. Anything beyond this basic
purpose is a dangerous perversion of the law.
Unfortunately, most
laws passed in recent history are doing just the opposite as they are suppose
to be doing. Legislators are passing more and more laws that benefit only
certain people. This type of selective plunder is a sure sign of
communistic socialism. Whenever the government "gives" something
to one person, it is actually taking away from another.
Both the Republicans
and Democrats along with most other political parties are guilty of what one
might call "Legal Plunder." The best description of legal plunder
and the true purpose of the law can be found in a pamphlet written by Frederick
Bastiat. Frederick Batstiat's work is simply entitled, "The Law."
Legal plunder, communism,
and socialism are the same thing in their most basic forms. Items are
transferred at one's expense to another. Whether this is done lawfully
or even willingly are of no concern. It is simply the philosophy that
is dangerous.
As one person is plundered
others will follow human nature which tells them that they should plunder also
in order to receive fair treatment. Thus we see how a proliferation of
"legal plunder" laws can fill society.
History tells us that
once this philosophy becomes entrenched the only way to end it is usually by
a total rebellion which usually leads to bloodshed. Perhaps we can save
our country before it meets this endless road, but it becomes less likely each
day we let it go.