Central Venous Catheterization & Arterial
Catheterization
James Allen, MD
-
I. Central venous cannulation
- A. flow rates
- 1. depends on both diameter & length
- 2. peripheral IVs often equal in flow rates compared to
CVCs
- 3. actual rates (Pediatr Emerg Care 1986; 2:153):
- a) 14g/2 inch: 93 ml/min
- b) 16g/2 inch: 75 ml/min
- c) 16g/5.25 inch: 64 ml/min
- d) 18g/2 inch: 62 ml/min
- e) 18g/8 inch: 13 ml/min
- f) 20g/2 inch: 42 ml/min
- g) 24g/.75 inch: 14 ml/min
- B. indications for CVCs:
- 1. inadequate peripheral veins
- 2. CVP monitoring
- 3. administration of phlebitic medications
- 4. rapid fluid replacement
- 5. CPR (medications reach the heart unpredictably from
peripheral veins during cardiac arrest with CPR)
- 6. frequent phlebotomy
- 7. long term IV therapy
- 8. dialysis
- 9. TPN
- 10. vasoactive drug administration
- C. specific sites:
- 1. general contraindications
- a) physician inexperience
- b) coagulopathy
- c) thrombolytic therapy
- d) severe thrombocytopenia
- e) inability to identify landmarks
- f) infection or burn at planned site
- g) uncooperative patient
- 2. internal jugular vein
- a) contraindications
- (1) SVC thrombosis
- (2) COPD
- (3) high levels of PEEP
- (4) tracheostomy with excessive secrestions
- (5) intracranial pressure elevation
- b) advantages
- (1) pneumothorax uncommon
- (2) high success rate
- (3) head of bed access
- (4) control of bleeding easy
- (5) right IJ represents straight path to the right
atrium (malposition unlikely)
- (6) less failure with inexperience
- c) disadvantages
- (1) not ideal for prolonged central venous
access
- (2) uncomfortable
- (3) dressings difficult to maintain
- (4) left IJ has risk of thoracic duct injury
- (5) poor landmarks in obese patients
- (6) not ideal for temporary dialysis access
- (7) difficult access with tracheostomies
- (8) difficult to establish access during emergent
intubation
- (9) higher incidence of infection
- 3. subclavian vein
- a) contraindications
- (1) SVC thrombosis
- (2) upper extremity trauma
- (3) COPD, asthma
- (4) high levels of PEEP
- (5) coagulopathy
- b) advantages
- (1) comfortable
- (2) easy to maintain dressings
- (3) better landmarks in obesity
- (4) vein less collapsable in hypovolemia or
shock
- (5) better access when airway control is being
established
- (6) lower incidence of infection
- c) disadvantages (New Engl J Med 1994; 331:1735-8)
- (1) higher risk of pneumothorax (1.5%)
- (2) compression difficult if bleeding occurs
- (a) artery puncture in 3.7%
- (b) mediastinal hematoma in 0.6%
- (3) requires experience for success
- (a) 32% failure rate for interns
- (b) 10.5% failure rate for residents
- (c) 11.7% failure rate for attendings
- (4) catheter malposition frequent
- (5) inaccessible from head of bed position
- (6) difficult to place during CPR
- 4. femoral vein
- a) contraindications
- (1) IVC filter
- (2) femoral or vena caval thrombosis
- (3) absent femoral pulse
- (4) penetrating abdominal trauma
- (5) cardiac arrest or low flow rates
- (6) requirements for patient mobility
- b) advantages
- (1) fast & easy with high success rate
- (2) does not interfer with CPR
- (3) does not interfer with airway placement
- (4) no risk of pneumothorax
- c) disadvantages
- (1) takes longer for drugs to reach central
circulation during CPR
- (2) complications possible in patients with abdominal
pathology
- (3) prevents patient mobilization
- (4) difficult to keep site sterile
- (5) difficult to pass PA catheter
- (6) high incidence of DVT
- (a) reported to be 25% when patients are
prospectively evaluated by duplex ultrasound (Crit
Care Med 1995; 23:52-9)
- (b) in a randomized trial of 289 patients, femoral
lines were associated with a 21.5% incidence of
thrombosis compared to a 1.9% incidence of venous
thrombosis with subclavian lines (JAMA.
2001;286:700-707)
- (7) high incidence of infection
- (a) in a randomized trial of 289 patients, femoral
lines were associated with a 19.8% incidence of
infection compared to a 4.5%% incidence of infection
with subclavian lines (JAMA. 2001;286:700-707)
- D. positioning (Chest 1995; 107:1662-4):
- 1. catheter tip position is optimally in the SVC and not in
the heart
- a) cardiac perforation can occur by tip erosion
- b) cardiac arrhthmias can occur by tip irritation
- 2. positioning equations to insure SVC tip position:
- a) right subclavian:
- (1) (height/10) - 2 cm
- b) left subclavian:
- (1) (height/10) + 2 cm
- c) right internal jugular:
- (1) (height/10) - 1 cm
- d) right subclavian:
- (1) (height/10) + 4 cm
- 3. average length of catheters appropriately placed:
- a) males:
- (1) right subclavian: 15.6 cm
- (2) left subclavian: 19.5 cm
- (3) right internal jugular: 17.1 cm
- (4) left internal jugular: 21.1 cm
- b) females:
- (1) right subclavian: 14.1 cm
- (2) left subclavian: 17.9 cm
- (3) right internal jugular: 15.7 cm
- (4) left internal jugular: 19.2 cm
- E. infection:
- 1. whether to routinely replace CVCs at set time periods is
uncertain
- a) routinely replacing CVCs every 3 days had an equal
number of line infections as replacing when clinically
indicated (fever, malfunction, site infection; average = 6
days) in one study of 160 patients (New Engl J Med 1992;
327:1062-8)
- b) one study found that there was an equal incidence of
infection in lines that were replaced either at a new site
OR guidewired at the original site. Both forms of line
replacement had a higher incidence of infection than "de
novo" lines at any given time point after placement of the
line. The overall incidence of infection was 2% of all
lines. (Mayo Clin Proc 1996; 71:838-46)
- c) the incidence of catheter-related infections rises
with the number of days the cathter is in place beyond 3
days
- d) the issue of whether CVCs should be routinely changed
is controversial and there is no definite recommendation at
this time (Federal Register, 1995; 60:49978-50006)
- e) the incidence of infection in antiseptic coated
catheters is 4-fold reduced (Maki, et. al., ICAAC Clinical
Infection Abstacts, 1991 & Bach, et. al., J. Antimicrob.
Chemo. 1994, 33:969-78)
- 2. the role of re-guiding CVCs is also uncertain
- a) re-guiding CVCs has a lower incidence of mechanical
complications but a similar incidence of catheter infection
compared to placing a new line at a new site (New Engl J Med
1992; 327:1062-8; Crit Care Med 1992; 20:1426-30)
- 3. types:
- a) site infection
- (1) purulence around the catheter insertion site
- b) tunnel infection
- (1) cellulitis involving the subcutaneous tunnel of
long-term catheters (Hickmans, Groshongs)
- c) catheter colonization
- (1) generally defined as > 15 colony forming units
on a catheter segment using a "roll plate" techinque (N
Engl J Med 1977; 296:1305-9)
- d) catheter sepsis
- (1) defined as clinical sepsis with positive blood
cultures and > 15 CFU on the CVC quantitative
culture
- (2) often presumptively diagnosed when no organism is
grown from the blood despite fever
- 4. etiology:
- a) skin insertion site
- (1) most important site of infection
- (2) careful decontamination of the site with topical
disinfectants and antibiotics decrease CVC
infections
- (3) transparent plastic dressings increase catheter
infection (JAMA 1992; 267:2072-6)
- (4) usually Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis,
& candida
- b) catheter hub
- c) infusate
- (1) usually gram negative bacteria
- d) hematogenous seeding of the catheter
- (1) rare
- 5. prevention (Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:391-402):
- a) chlorhexidine prep is associated with a 4-fold
decrease in catheter infection than 70% alcohol or
povidone-iodine prep (Lancet 1991; 338:339-43)
- b) povidone-iodine ointment at the insertions site does
not reduce the probability of infection but topical
polymyxin-neomycin-bacitracin does (Am J Med 1981;
70:739-44); a new chlorhexidine "sponge" (Biopatch) is
currently the optimal antimicrobial dressing
- c) antibiotic coated catheters have a 50% lower
incidence of infection
- d) perform a > 15 second hand wash with chlorhexidine
(or equivilent) before placing the catheter
- e) use a gown, gloves, mask, and hat
- f) if using povidone-iodine, allow it to dry for full
antibacterial effects
- g) provide a large enough sterile area using drapes so
as to minimize the chance of contamination; a full sterile
barrier sheet is preferred over the smaller sterile drapes
normally contained within the CVC kits
- h) do not routinely use antibiotic ointment at the
catheter insertion site after the line is placed;
povidone-iodine ointment does reduce infection of
hemodialysis catheters when administered at the catheter
insertion site and should be additionally used in
immunosuppressed patients receiving CVCs in whom there is a
high likelihood of Staph. aureus carriage
- i) specialized catheter hubs filled with iodinated
alcohol or hub-protective povidone-iodine-saturated sponges
can reduce catheter infections but are not yet available in
the United States
- j) the subclavian approach has a lower incidence of
infection than the IJ approach (An J Med 1991;
91:197S-205S)
- k) stopper on hubs should be adequately cleansed with
alcolhol pads before inserting needles
- 6. current OSU catheter policy:
- a) do not routinely change CVCs
- b) a CVC may be re-guided only for mechanical
failure
- c) use antiseptic-coated catheters if anticipated
duration of use is > 3 days (there are many such
catheters available; the Arrow catheter kit is preferable at
this time)
- d) TPN ports must be dedicated as such and not used for
other purposes
- e) replace non-sterile lines and "code blue" lines at
the earliest convenience
- f) replace tubing every 72 hours
- (1) tubing used for blood, TPN, or lipid emulsions
(ie, propofol, amphotericin B, etc.) should be changed
every 24 hours
- g) remove line as soon as it is no longer needed
- h) convert IV meds to oral as soon as possible to
minimize the number of times the tubing circuit must be
opened
- i) catheter tips should not be routinely cultured but do
send the tip (removed and cut under sterile conditions) when
line infection is suspected
- (1) send a concurrent pediatric blood culture tube
with 3 cc of blood drawn from the line
- (2) send a concurrent standard blood culture tube
from a peripheral site
- F. thrombosis
- 1. mural thrombosis very common (38% of CVCs) although
clinical DVT is less frequent (JAMA 1994; 271:1024-6)
- 2. femoral sites should be avoided except under
circumstances that prevent use of alternative access sites
II. Arterial line placement
- A. sites:
- 1. radial artery first choice
- a) contraindication = absence of collateral ulnar flow
- (1) occurs in Å 15-20% of patients
- (2) assess with Allen's test first
- (a) occlude both ulnar & radial arteries
- (b) have patient open and close the hand until
blanching occurs
- (c) release ulnar pressure
- (d) color return to entire hand should occur in
< 7 seconds
- (e) color return in > 14 seconds is
abnormal
- (f) color return in 7-14 seconds is
indeterminate
- b) after lidocaine anesthesia, introduce the needle at
45°
- c) pentration of both sides of the artery is frequent;
therefore, withdraw the needle slowly since you may atain
good bevel position during withdrawl
- d) do not alter the angle or direction of the needle
while the needle is still under the skin but not in the
vessel since the artery can be lacerated
- e) reducing the angle of the needle to Å 15-20°
after penetration of the artery allows easier threading of
the guidewire
- f) if difficulty is encountered, measures which can
occasionally be helpful include:
- (1) wrapping the wrist and hand in a warm towel
- (2) increasing intravascular volume with isotonic
solution
- (3) placing a small amount of topical nitroglycerin
over the artery
- (4) identifying the artery by doppler flow prior to
preping the entrance site
- 2. femoral artery second choice
- a) can use a larger (18g) catheter
- b) shave the groin first
- c) approach 1-3 cm below the inguinal ligament to
prevent perforation of the peritoneum or a smaller iliac
artery branch
- d) contraindications = severe atherosclerosis or absence
of a femoral pulse
- 3. dorsalis pedis third choice
- a) modified Allen's test can be performed using the
posterior tibial artery but this has not been validated as
effective; the patient should at least have a posterior
tibial pulse
- b) if there is peripheral vascular disease, the true
central BP may be underestimated
- c) because of wave mechanics, the systolic BP may be
overestimated and the diastolic BP may be underestimated;
the mean arterial pressure should be correct and is the
preferable parameter to follow when using dorsalis pedis
lines
- d) this site has an increased incidence of thrombosis
(Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:482)
- 4. brachial artery should not be used because of potential
thrombosis
- B. complications:
- 1. bleeding
- a) most risky in femoral artery cannulation since
pressure within the pelvis cannot be applied
- 2. distal ischemia
- a) partial obstruction occurs in 20-48% of
cannulations
- b) incidence decreases with smaller gauge catheters
(non-tapered 20g catheters better than 18 g catheters)
- c) catheter placed by cut down have a higher incidence
of occlusion
- d) permanant ischemia is rare, occurring in 0.5% of
cannulations
- 3. infection
- a) incidence (2-8%) is reported to be similar to that of
CVCs (J Crit Ill 1989; 63:381) although in our experience it
is lower
- b) infection is minimized by limiting stopcock
manipulation, limiting phlebotomy through the arterial line,
and changing line every 4 days
- c) the current recommendations by the CDC includes
routine changing of the a-line every 4 days
-
last updated 8-19-2001
-
- TOP OF
PAGE
- Return to the For Residents
Page